Stop Chemical Terrorism

When Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz struggled to find the person who created her tornado and destroyed her home finally found the “man behind the curtain,” it was rather easy to see that he was nothing more than a deranged and delusional psychopath – who simply wanted to appear powerful by using various techniques to make himself look like a “big man.”

“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”

When people are asked about geoengineering, there never seems to be an accurate finger-point. Why is that?

What I always seem to hear is the word “they.”
“They are spraying us with chemtrails.”
Who are “they?”

Let’s explore.

The following excerpts are taken from Wikipedia, Climate Engineering:

“Several notable organizations have investigated geoengineering with a view to evaluating its potential, including the US Congress, NASA, the Royal Society, the Institute of Mechanical Engineers,and the UK Parliament.

The Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies was convened to identify and develop risk reduction guidelines for climate intervention experimentation. Several geoengineering strategies have been proposed. IPCC documents detail several notable proposals.These fall into two main categories: solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal. However, other proposals exist.

The Geoengineering Climate: Technical Evaluation and Discussion of Impacts project of the National Academy of Sciences funded by United States agencies, including NOAA, NASA, and the CIA, commenced in March 2013, is expected to issue a report in fall 2014.

“An ad hoc committee will conduct a technical evaluation of a limited number of proposed geoengineering techniques, including examples of both solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques, and comment generally on the potential impacts of deploying these technologies, including possible environmental, economic, and national security concerns. The study will:

1. Evaluate what is currently known about the science of several (3-4) selected example techniques, including potential risks and consequences (both intended and unintended), such as impacts, or lack thereof, on ocean acidification,
2. Describe what is known about the viability for implementation of the proposed techniques including technological and cost considerations,
3. Briefly explain other geoengineering technologies that have been proposed (beyond the selected examples), and
4. Identify future research needed to provide a credible scientific underpinning for future discussions.

The study will also discuss historical examples of related technologies (e.g., cloud seeding and other weather modification) for lessons that might be learned about societal reactions, examine what international agreements exist which may be relevant to the experimental testing or deployment of geoengineering technologies, and briefly explore potential societal and ethical considerations related to geoengineering. This study is intended to provide a careful, clear scientific foundation that informs ethical, legal, and political discussions surrounding geoengineering.

The project has support from the National Academy of Sciences, the U.S. intelligence community, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The approximate start date for the project is March 2013; a report is expected be issued in fall 2014.”

There are many organizations investigating the use of chemical terrorism and weather warfare. This is a global program and a global scheme. There is no one organization to point the finger at. However, NASA has been appointed to “head” the geoengineering program.

Chemical terrorism researchers a.k.a “The Climate Cult” members:

Jane Long, Co-Chair
Associate Director-at-Large, Energy and Environment Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Stephen Rademaker, Co-Chair
Senior Counsel, BGR Government Affairs, LLC
Former Assistant Secretary of State
James G. Anderson
Philip S. Weld Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry, Harvard University

 

Richard Elliot Benedick
President, National Council for Science and the Environment
Former Ambassador and chief U.S. negotiator for the 1987 Montreal Protocol

 

Ken Caldeira
Senior Scientist, Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution, Stanford University

 

Joe Chaisson
Research and Technical Director, Clean Air Task Force

 

David Goldston
Director of Government Affairs, Natural Resources Defense Council
Former Staff Director for the House Science Committee; Columnist on science policy for Nature

 

Steven Hamburg
Chief Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund

 

David Keith
Director, ISEEE Energy and Environmental Systems Group, University of Calgary

 

Ron Lehman
Director, Center for Global Security Research, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

 

Frank Loy
Former Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs

 

Granger Morgan
Lord Chair Professor in Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University

 

Daniel Sarewitz
Director, Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Arizona State University

 

Thomas Schelling
Distinguished University Professor Emeritus, University of Maryland

 

 

John Shepherd
Professorial Research Fellow in Earth System Science, School of Ocean & Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton

 

David Victor
Professor, School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California, San Diego

 

David Whelan
Boeing Integrated Defense Systems Chief Scientist and Vice President-General Manager, Deputy to the President of IDS Advanced Systems, Boeing Corporation
Former Director of the Tactical Technology Office of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)

 

David E. Winickoff
Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley

 

 

 

http://bipartisanpolicy.org/projects/task-force-geoengineering/about

For more information on the blatent discussion of chemical terrorism use against citizens, see Google Groups “GEO.” Headed by Andrew Lockley, a “financial advisor” who knows just as much about the climate as a troll at the end of a rainbow.

See Also:
http://news.sciencemag.org/2009/03/darpa-explore-geoengineering
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2013-07/spooks-look-mad-science-global-warming-solution

Aside from the fact that geoengineering is a current program in testing phase, we still have a few non-believers in chemical terrorism, who simply label the trails in the sky as “contrails,” or “condensation trails.”

Unfortunately, those folks must take a step towards reality before we are able to face it head on. There is no such thing as a “condensation trail” of water that emits from a jet engine. If water is coming from any combustion engine, of any kind, whether vehicle or aircraft, the engine would not be in operation.

Why? Because combustion engines rely on combustion, which is burning – and water does just the opposite.

In fact, within most planes, kerosene is used as jet fuel. If water is added to this fuel, the combustion engine will not operate. Now that we have dispelled the “contrail” myth, let us dig deeper into what aircraft emissions actually consist of:

“An exhaust system is usually piping used to guide reaction exhaust gases away from a controlled combustion inside an engine … [and] must be carefully designed to carry toxic and/or noxious gases away from the users of the machine.” -Wikipedia, Exhaust System

We have two types of geoengineering:

1) Intentional geoengineering with installed manifests.

2) Unintentional or “contracted” geoengineering, fuel additives that contain chemicals

“JP-8 is formulated with icing inhibitor, corrosion inhibitors, lubricants, and antistatic agents, and less benzene (a carcinogen) and less n–hexane (a neurotoxin) than JP-4. However, it also smells stronger than JP-4. JP-8 has an oily feel to the touch, while JP-4 feels more like a solvent.” -Wikipedia, JP-8

So, we have officially dispelled the “contrail” myth with a simple scientific understanding of an exhaust system. It is a well-known fact that condensation trails can only form at an altitude above 50,000 feet. However, using this simple analogy of “water from combustion engines is ignorant” might help us ward off a few trolls in the future.

One other argument that a person might portray, is that air consists of oxygen – and fuel within aircraft contain hydrogen. When combining hydrogen emissions plus oxygen, you may see a condensation trail form from the aircraft.

However, the amount of oxygen at 50,000 feet is not enough to produce a condensation trail. In addition, Hydrogen is no longer used in aircraft fuel.

At 50000ft, the standard barometric pressure is13 kPa (99 mmHg). This means that there is 13% of the oxygen available at sea level.

http://www.altitude.org/air_pressure.php

The simple fact is, according to science, any trail left behind any aircraft – is a chemical. Regardless of length, persistence, or excuse – it is a chemical – and the FAA should be contacted immediately to report a “smoking aircraft.”

Geoengineering is illegal. The “global warming” scheme has failed. We all know better, by now. It would take a truly insane and delusional human being, an extremely sociopathic and demented individual, a “mad scientist” or “serial killer,” if you will, to ever promote “spraying pollution to combat ‘global warming.'”

Now, again, we all know better. Time to do something about it.

For a list of official tests that have been performed within recent years, see Wikipedia “Climate Engineering.”

Multiple firms, including the Central Intelligence Agency and NASA, have participated in chemical terrorism tests on the public population. For more information into previous tests, see “chaff (countermeasure).”

Regardless of what chemical is in the sky, geoengineering is an intentional addition of chemicals to the atmosphere, to the public’s air supply, and to our breathing space. As in the 1950 Supreme Court Case “Southwest Weather Research, Inc. v. Duncan,” no cloud seeding activities are allowed to take place over the unconsenting population. Doing so is a trespass, and cloud seeding is, according to federal law, a “nuisance” in 48 out of 50 states.

See: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol9/iss2/11/ (Download PDF)

The problem that we are now facing is “global dimming,” and extreme health issues from the exhaust produced by aircraft, which use chemicals other than simple jet fuel, and especially from geoengineering and cloud seeding – the intentional and deliberate addition of chemicals to our air supply.

See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/dimming_trans.shtml

These “tests” are nothing new. In fact, the first successful aircraft cloud seeding experiment was performed in 1923. Ground cloud seeding experiments have taken place since last century. For anyone to deny this, or simply state that what you are seeing is “condensation,” is nothing more than the denial phase of their own demise.

“Facts are facts, independent of any consciousness. No amount of passionate wishing, desperate longing or hopeful pleading can alter the facts. Nor will ignoring or evading the facts erase them: the facts remain, immutable.” -Ayn Rand

As far back as Napoleon, sulfur dioxide has been used for genocide. In fact, Napoleon gassed many slaves within the hulls of ships with sulfur dioxide – leading to the slaughter of over 100,000 Caribbean slaves (Haitians).

See: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/1504014/Napoleons-genocide-on-a-par-with-Hitler.html

With as many as 40% of people dying from air pollution, this should be a cause of concern for every single human. No matter who you are – everyone will be affected by air pollution – sometime within their lifetime. When 2 out of 5 people presently die from air pollution, the reality is – at least one of every person’s family members will succumb to the negative effects of pollution.

See: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070813162438.htm

In America, we have enough funds, enough technology, and enough resources to end every single particulate of pollution in our nation. We even have an organization designed to ensure that this happens, called the “Environmental Protection Agency.” Why do over 200,000 Americans die from air pollution yearly? Worldwide, the number is well over 7 million.

See: http://lae.mit.edu/air-pollution-causes-200000-early-deaths-each-year-in-the-u-s/

Automobiles, planes, trains, and other combustion engines produce a large portion of pollution. Energy production with combustion methods produce even more. However, the number one cause of pollution is: you guessed it – geoengineering.

See: http://sth.sagepub.com/content/36/2/190.short

The intentional addition of atmospheric pollutants to the air, especially with sulfur dioxide, is obviously an act of murder. Quite actually, on a daily basis, we can call it “genocide.” Serial killing would be a light term to use for each drone operator who performs such disgusting acts of cruelty.

So, we have Napoleon, Hitler – who’s next? With 7 million dead in 2012 from pollution alone… we all know the reality by now. There is no “disinformation campaign” that can serve as an insanity plea for the geoengineers. There is no “global warming” excuse that they can now use to keep gassing the population with sulfur dioxide.

The reality is… we all know better. It’s time to do more than we know. Act, rather than observe. This should have been ended before it started – but unfortunately, we are allowing history to repeat itself.

We can only hope for the sake of humanity, that we are able to look back on this, one day – just as Hitler’s holocaust, and say to ourselves “I’m glad that’s over. You see how those people were? What freaks. I’m glad we’ve evolved since then.”

For years, some doctors labeled the infection of Agrobacterium Tumefaciens, now known as Rhizobium Radiobacter, as “delusional parasitosis” – adding insult to injury for the affected victims. Now, we know the victims to be victims of quackery doctors – in addition to Morgellons disease (http://www.morgellons-uk.net/pdf/morgellons07.pdf).

The original patent of the Morgellons-causing agent, Agrobacterium Tumefaciens transformation method, was patented by Monsanto. Monsanto is an organization that is known by many, and hated by most. Although Agrobacterium Tumefaciens is a natural soil bacteria, it is a transformed product of Monsanto (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roundup_Ready_soybean).

Agrobacterium Tumefaciens is also known as “crown gall disease” within plants (http://www.google.com/patents/US6603061). Agrobacterium Tumefaciens, a gram-negative soil bacteria, is pathogenic to both humans and plants. By dispersing this patented “transformation method” bacteria over the soil, organic plants, such as soybeans, cannot grow. However, if the plants are grown with Monsanto’s patented seed, which is resistant to the bacteria, the plant can still grow.

Can anyone say “food monopoly?” Let’s clarify the situation a bit further:

Monsanto’s seed monopoly has unfortunately caused nearly all organic seeds to become extinct – and little to the knowledge of the American public. GMO seeds do not yet have to be labeled in most states – leaving Americans to assume that they are growing “natural” farmed food. Unfortunately, this is not the case. In fact, over 90% of seeds are now extinct, thanks to Monsanto (http://www.fastcodesign.com/1669753/infographic-in-80-years-we-lost-93-of-variety-in-our-food-seeds).

Not only this, our bee population has seen a drastic increase recently. With many bee farmers wondering why their bees are dying or flying away from their nests, in addition to the obvious lack of pollination within many of our plants, numerous documentaries and inquiries have been created into the recent bee scare.

Now, we know none other than our lovely Monsanto, to be our culprit: (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2014/05/09/pesticides-not-mites-cause-honeybee-colony-collapse/#.U_w5eJ-cYeI)

So, how could this gram-negative soil bacteria be spread over the population without their knowledge or consent? This constitutes biological terrorism, and is illegal. However, bioprecipitation, the concept of “rain-making bacteria,” uses gram-negative soil bacteria to produce rain. And, it is used in cloud seeding (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioprecipitation).

This is a very disturbing organization, as is cloud seeding a disturbing action. Who would be this classless and disgusting to create a disease that has now affected nearly every single American in some form or fashion? Why are over 14,000 families still suffering from this disease?

Leave it to our “friends” at Monsanto. Creating destruction of our environment since 1901.

Let’s “connect the dots” between geoengineering and Morgellons. Bill Gates funds geoengineering (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/06/bill-gates-climate-scientists-geoengineering) in addition to the Rockefeller Institute (http://www.cfr.org/projects/world/geoengineering-workshop-on-unilateral-planetary-scale-geoengineering/pr1364).

Both have also funded Monsanto (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-holt-gimenez/monsanto-in-gates-clothin_b_696182.html, http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/pages/monsanto-ceo-to-rockefeller-foundation-president-gordon-conway-terminator-technology.aspx).

Both Rockefeller and Gates also have a “Doomsday Seed Vault” stored in the Arctic (http://www.globalresearch.ca/doomsday-seed-vault-in-the-arctic-2/23503).

This seems more like a greedy doomsday insanity cult – than just a simple global food monopoly. With Bill Gates’ vaccination programs and his production of the buggy Windows operating system, I do not trust him with my global food supply. With Rockfeller’s history of promoting “population stabilization,” neither do I trust him with my food supply. Monsanto should chalk it up as a loss – because nobody trusts them – and nobody wants their disgusting pesticide-laced food.

Eating from Monsanto’s Round-up laced meal without our knowledge is like a date rapist slipping in a little bit of Round-up in our drink. Unfortunately, for over 90% of our food – it is no further from the truth. And with Morgellons disease added to their list of “accomplishments” – there is little left to the imagination as to what this company accomplishes for society in general.

We can do an “ice bucket challenge” for 6,000 ALS patients per year. Who’s going to do it for the Morgellons’ victims Awareness has been raised about Morgellons. Most people have been well-aware of this fact since 2010. However, nothing has been done about it. And, that is exactly the problem.

“Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism, whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.”
-Secretary of Defense William Cohen

Discussing the idea of intentionally causing a volcanic eruption, in Google Group “GEO,” none other than our lovely domestic terrorist and financial advisor, Andrew Lockley.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/geoengineering/volcano$20eruption/geoengineering/eaff7IPUEg0/SuA5lmc5YSAJ

What is it like to “play God?” What would it be like to murder someone – or destroy an entire town – from a safe distance, while never answering for what you have to do? Just ask the guys at HAARP.

The above photo shows what HAARP is able to do with an ionospheric heater. Note the word “heater.” Electromagnetic fields are directed at a portion of the atmosphere, which when reflected, are able to target specific areas with weather patterns. This is an obvious weather-control research pattern – and has proven to be extremely destructive over recent years.

The “coincidences” attributed to the use of HAARP, combined with the time anomalies of their atmospheric heater activation, are – according to probability and statistics – related to HAARP itself. HAARP has recently removed their magnetometer (the measure of EMF ejection) from the public view, and is no longer available on their website.

The massive earthquake of Japan, and the Tsunami of Haiti are events directly attributed to HAARP – just to name a few. With the last few years of extreme weather patterns, we are left with no “coincidences” when it comes to this machine of destruction.

In addition, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program uses the protection of a military name to perform their acts of weather warfare (http://fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm). However, these are not “soldiers.” These are a group of experimental “scientists” with no more knowledge of the atmosphere than many high-school students (http://vlf.stanford.edu/research/experiments-haarp-ionospheric-heater).

We are left to reap the “benefits” of this project, and left paying the check for our own (intentional) destruction.

Obviously, cloud seeding and geoengineering are the two basic causes of every storm. Because, according to physics, clouds cannot form naturally on earth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_physics). However, these “tests” within the atmosphere are able to control and steer weather patterns, and this is the exact stated purpose of this facility (http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2005-10-19/who-controls-the-weather).

Regardless of cloud seeding, geoengineering, or directed ionospheric-heater testing – all weather modification is banned, globally. See our “Weather Modification History” page for more details.

Unfortunately, with the removal of the magnetometer from public view, it is no longer to prove that HAARP created any weather pattern within a particular area. HAARP had a North, South, East, and West grid for each of their locations in Alaska. When the magnetometer was online – it was a rather simple process.

Now, we are only left to speculate. One thing is for sure – HAARP should be closed. There is absolutely no purpose for this waste of Federal tax dollars, and it is in blatant violation of American laws and of International Weather Modification treaties.

When geoengineering “scientists,” such as Ken Caldeira (Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution of Washington), run out of excuses to pollute the planet – they turn to intentional methods of planetary destruction – in exchange for profit.

Two conferences were held in Leningrad in the early 1960′s following an initial meeting in Moscow by the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1959. Borisov’s suggestions to warm the arctic included:

• Covering great areas of the Arctic with black powders such as coal dust (G. Veksler, 1959) (Carbon Black)

• Dispersing the cloud cover over the central Arctic Basin (D. Fletcher, 1958) (Geoengineering Aerosols)

• Deepening of the Thomson Sill (V.N. Stepanov, 1963)

• Covering the water surface with a monomolecular film (M. Budyko, 1962)

• Installations to direct warmer Atlantic water into the Kara Sea (V.P. P’yankov, 1965)

• Pumping cold Arctic water into the Pacific to draw warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Basin (P.M. Borisov, c. 1968)

History repeats itself. Is the excuse now called “global warming?” I think not.
It has always been profit and fearmongering, and always will be.

“Simulations of stratospheric geoengineering with black carbon (BC) aerosols using a general circulation model with fixed sea surface temperatures show that the climate effects strongly depend on aerosol size and altitude of injection. 1 Tg BC a^-1 injected into the lower stratosphere would cause little surface cooling for large radii but a large amount of surface cooling for small radii and stratospheric warming of over 60°C.”

http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/kr03000u.html